Iran vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Iran
78.4%
in 2019
Poland
78.3%
in 2019
Iran rank
32nd
Poland rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Iran
- Poland
How they compare
Iran currently reports 78.4% against 78.3% in Poland, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Iran has been ahead every year.
Iran ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 33rd of 190 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.0% | 78.7% | 2.2% | Iran |
| 2010s | 80.0% | 78.4% | 1.5% | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Iran or Poland?
- Iran, at 78.4% against 78.3% in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Iran and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Poland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Iran and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Iran ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 33rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.