Equatorial Guinea vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
78.2%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
78.4%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
34th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
32nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 78.4% against 78.2% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 32nd of 190 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.3% | 81.0% | 1.7% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 78.5% | 80.0% | 1.4% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 78.4% against 78.2% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.2%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 32nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.