Fiji vs Kenya: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Fiji
52.2%
in 2019
Kenya
53.1%
in 2019
Fiji rank
154th
Kenya rank
153rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Fiji
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 53.1% against 52.2% in Fiji, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 154th and Kenya ranks 153rd of 190 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.2% | 65.6% | 13.4% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 52.2% | 53.1% | 0.9% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Fiji or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 53.1% against 52.2% in Fiji as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Fiji and Kenya?
- 0.9%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Kenya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Fiji and Kenya rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Fiji ranks 154th and Kenya ranks 153rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.