Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Zambia
Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Zambia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Zambia stood at 0 DB16-20 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
That places Zambia 164th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Zambia, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2017 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | -100.0% |
| 2019 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
Zambia compared with similar countries
- Zambia's 0 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology. (47 countries reporting)
- Zambia's 0 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 164 Algeria 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Egypt 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Eritrea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Gambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Laos 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Qatar 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 164 Somalia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 South Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Syria 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Tunisia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Palestine 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Yemen 0 DB16-20 methodology
More reference data data for Zambia
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Political opposition, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament and government, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled 0 events (2025)
- Annual precipitation, annual growth rate 40.84 % change on previous year (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 4 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Zambia?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Zambia was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2017.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Zambia rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Zambia ranks 164th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.