Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Laos

Laos: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
161st
of 188 countries
All-time high
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Laos, 2015–2019

00.20.40.60.812015201720192015: 0 DB16-20 methodology2016: 0 DB16-20 methodology2017: 0 DB16-20 methodology2018: 0 DB16-20 methodology2019: 0 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Laos is 0 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That places Laos 161st out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Laos

  1. 161 Algeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 161 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 161 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 161 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 161 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 161 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 161 Egypt 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 161 Eritrea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 161 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 161 Gambia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 161 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 161 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 161 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 161 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 161 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 161 Qatar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 161 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 161 Somalia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 161 South Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 161 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 161 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 161 Syria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 161 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 161 Tunisia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 161 Palestine 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 161 Yemen 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 161 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Laos

All data for Laos →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Laos?
Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Laos was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Laos?
The highest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Laos?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Laos rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Laos ranks 161st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Laos data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.