Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Samoa
Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Samoa, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Samoa stood at 0 DB16-20 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over five years.
That places Samoa 164th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Samoa, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2019 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
Samoa compared with similar countries
- Samoa's 0 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2.25 DB16-20 methodology. (56 countries reporting)
- Samoa's 0 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.5 DB16-20 methodology. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Samoa
- 164 Algeria 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Egypt 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Eritrea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Gambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Laos 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Qatar 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Somalia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 South Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Syria 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Tunisia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Palestine 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Yemen 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 164 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Samoa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.023 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0626 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0918 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1693 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Samoa?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Samoa was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2016.
- How does Samoa rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Samoa ranks 164th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.