Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Sierra Leone, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Sierra Leone recorded 2 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Sierra Leone ranks 74th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Sierra Leone, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Sierra Leone compared with similar countries
- Sierra Leone's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.75 DB16-20 methodology, 2.7× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Sierra Leone's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Sierra Leone
- 74 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Ecuador 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 El Salvador 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Eswatini 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Fiji 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Finland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Honduras 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Hong Kong 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Iceland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Jamaica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Jordan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Liberia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Madagascar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Malawi 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Marshall Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Morocco 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Mozambique 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 South Africa 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Tajikistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Thailand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Trinidad and Tobago 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Sierra Leone
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0238 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0797 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6534 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Sierra Leone?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Sierra Leone was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Sierra Leone rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 74th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.