Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Jamaica
Jamaica: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Jamaica, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Jamaica recorded 2 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over five years.
Jamaica ranks 74th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Jamaica, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +100.0% |
Jamaica compared with similar countries
- Jamaica's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2.25 DB16-20 methodology, 89% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Jamaica's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Jamaica
- 74 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Ecuador 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 El Salvador 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Eswatini 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Fiji 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Finland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Honduras 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Hong Kong 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Iceland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Jordan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Liberia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Madagascar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Malawi 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Marshall Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Morocco 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Mozambique 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Sierra Leone 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 South Africa 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Tajikistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Thailand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 74 Trinidad and Tobago 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Jamaica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.045 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1808 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1508 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0583 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8486 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0015 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Jamaica?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Jamaica was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Jamaica?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Jamaica?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Jamaica rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Jamaica ranks 74th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Jamaica data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.