Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Finland

Finland: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
74th
of 191 countries
All-time high
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Finland, 2015–2019

00.511.522015201720192015: 2 DB16-20 methodology2016: 2 DB16-20 methodology2017: 2 DB16-20 methodology2018: 2 DB16-20 methodology2019: 2 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Finland is 2 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Finland ranks 74th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Finland, year by year

Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2015 2 DB16-20 methodology —
2016 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%

Finland compared with similar countries

  • Finland's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Finland's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Finland

  1. 74 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 74 Ecuador 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 74 El Salvador 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 74 Eswatini 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 74 Fiji 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 74 Honduras 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 74 Hong Kong 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 74 Iceland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 74 Jamaica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 74 Jordan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 74 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 74 Liberia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 74 Madagascar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 74 Malawi 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 74 Marshall Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 74 Morocco 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 74 Mozambique 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 74 Sierra Leone 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 74 South Africa 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 74 Tajikistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 74 Thailand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 74 Trinidad and Tobago 2 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Finland

All data for Finland →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Finland?
Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Finland was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Finland?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Finland?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Finland rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Finland ranks 74th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Finland data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Finland. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/finland/">Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Finland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.