Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Antigua and Barbuda
Antigua and Barbuda: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Antigua and Barbuda, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Antigua and Barbuda stood at 3 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
That places Antigua and Barbuda 43rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Antigua and Barbuda, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Antigua and Barbuda compared with similar countries
- Antigua and Barbuda's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Antigua and Barbuda's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda
- 42 Mexico 3.34 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Brazil 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Armenia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Azerbaijan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Bahrain 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Bhutan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Cape Verde 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Czechia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Dominica 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 France 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Grenada 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Mauritius 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Moldova 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 New Zealand 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Slovenia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Saint Kitts and Nevis 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Saint Lucia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Ukraine 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Uruguay 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Antigua and Barbuda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0141 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0035 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0493 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Antigua and Barbuda was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 43rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.