Antigua and Barbuda vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

Antigua and Barbuda
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
43rd
New Zealand rank
43rd

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • New Zealand
0123201520172019

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 43rd of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Antigua and Barbuda or New Zealand?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 43rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/antigua-and-barbuda/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/antigua-and-barbuda/new-zealand/">Antigua and Barbuda vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.