Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Mauritius

Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
3 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
up 50.0%
World rank
43rd
of 188 countries
All-time high
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
All-time low
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Mauritius, 2015–2019

01232015201720192015: 2 DB16-20 methodology2016: 2 DB16-20 methodology2017: 2 DB16-20 methodology2018: 2 DB16-20 methodology2019: 3 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Mauritius is 3 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 50.0% on the previous year and up 50.0% over five years.

That places Mauritius 43rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Mauritius

  1. 42 Mexico 3.34 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 43 Brazil 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 43 Antigua and Barbuda 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 43 Armenia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 43 Azerbaijan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 43 Bahrain 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 43 Bhutan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 43 Cape Verde 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 43 Czechia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 43 Dominica 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 43 France 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 43 Grenada 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 43 Moldova 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 43 New Zealand 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 43 Slovenia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 43 Saint Kitts and Nevis 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 43 Saint Lucia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 43 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 43 Ukraine 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 43 Uruguay 3 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Mauritius

All data for Mauritius →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Mauritius?
Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Mauritius was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Mauritius?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Mauritius?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Mauritius rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Mauritius ranks 43rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Mauritius data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.