Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Palestine, State of
Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. β¬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Palestine, State of, 2015β2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Palestine, State of recorded 2 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Palestine, State of ranks 117th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Palestine, State of
- 117 Pakistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Afghanistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Argentina 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Bahamas 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Bahrain 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Botswana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Brunei Darussalam 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Cape Verde 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Czechia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Djibouti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Equatorial Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Eswatini 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Fiji 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Grenada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guatemala 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guyana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Haiti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Iceland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Kosovo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Lebanon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Libya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Maldives 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Micronesia, Federated States of 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Mongolia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Montenegro 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Namibia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 New Zealand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Papua New Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Puerto Rico 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Qatar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Saudi Arabia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Seychelles 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Slovakia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Somalia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 South Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Suriname 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Syrian Arab Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Tajikistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Tunisia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 United Arab Emirates 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Uruguay 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Vanuatu 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Yemen 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 117 Zimbabwe 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Palestine, State of
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0105 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1625 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.177 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.004 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.177 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0352 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0127 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6383 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7088 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.022 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Palestine, State of?
- Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Palestine, State of was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Palestine, State of?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Palestine, State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Palestine, State of rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Palestine, State of ranks 117th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Palestine, State of data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.