Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uruguay

Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
117th
of 188 countries
All-time high
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uruguay, 2015–2019

00.511.522015201720192015: 2 DB16-20 methodology2016: 2 DB16-20 methodology2017: 2 DB16-20 methodology2018: 2 DB16-20 methodology2019: 2 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 2 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Uruguay ranks 117th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Uruguay

  1. 117 Pakistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 117 Afghanistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 117 Argentina 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 117 Bahamas 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 117 Bahrain 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 117 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 117 Botswana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 117 Brunei 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 117 Cape Verde 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 117 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 117 Czechia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 117 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 117 Equatorial Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 117 Eswatini 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 117 Fiji 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 117 Grenada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 117 Guatemala 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 117 Guyana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 117 Haiti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 117 Iceland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 117 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 117 Lebanon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 117 Libya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 117 Maldives 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 117 Micronesia (country) 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 117 Mongolia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 117 Montenegro 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 117 Namibia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 117 New Zealand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 117 Papua New Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 117 Puerto Rico 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 117 Qatar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 117 Saudi Arabia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 117 Seychelles 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 117 Slovakia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 117 Somalia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  37. 117 South Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  38. 117 Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  39. 117 Suriname 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  40. 117 Syria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  41. 117 Tajikistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  42. 117 Tunisia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  43. 117 United Arab Emirates 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  44. 117 United Kingdom 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  45. 117 Vanuatu 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  46. 117 Venezuela 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  47. 117 Palestine 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  48. 117 Yemen 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  49. 117 Zimbabwe 2 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Uruguay

All data for Uruguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uruguay?
Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uruguay was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Uruguay?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Uruguay?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Uruguay rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Uruguay ranks 117th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.