Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia

Slovakia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
117th
of 191 countries
All-time high
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia, 2015–2019

00.511.522015201720192015: 2 DB16-20 methodology2016: 2 DB16-20 methodology2017: 2 DB16-20 methodology2018: 2 DB16-20 methodology2019: 2 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia is 2 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

That places Slovakia 117th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia, year by year

Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2015 2 DB16-20 methodology —
2016 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%

Slovakia compared with similar countries

  • Slovakia's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 80% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Slovakia's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 80% of the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Slovakia

  1. 117 Pakistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 117 Afghanistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 117 Argentina 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 117 Bahamas 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 117 Bahrain 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 117 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 117 Botswana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 117 Brunei 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 117 Cape Verde 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 117 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 117 Czechia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 117 Djibouti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 117 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 117 Equatorial Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 117 Eswatini 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 117 Fiji 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 117 Grenada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 117 Guatemala 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 117 Guyana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 117 Haiti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 117 Iceland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 117 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 117 Kosovo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 117 Lebanon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 117 Libya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 117 Maldives 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 117 Micronesia (country) 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 117 Mongolia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 117 Montenegro 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 117 Namibia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 117 New Zealand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 117 Papua New Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 117 Puerto Rico 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 117 Qatar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 117 Saudi Arabia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 117 Seychelles 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  37. 117 Somalia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  38. 117 South Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  39. 117 Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  40. 117 Suriname 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  41. 117 Syria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  42. 117 Tajikistan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  43. 117 Tunisia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  44. 117 United Arab Emirates 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  45. 117 United Kingdom 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  46. 117 Uruguay 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  47. 117 Vanuatu 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  48. 117 Venezuela 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  49. 117 Palestine 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  50. 117 Yemen 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  51. 117 Zimbabwe 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  52. 117 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 2 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Slovakia

All data for Slovakia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia?
Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Slovakia?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Slovakia?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Slovakia rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Slovakia ranks 117th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Slovakia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/slovak-republic/">Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Slovakia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.