Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uzbekistan, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uzbekistan is 3 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is up 50.0% on the previous year and up 50.0% over five years.
Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +50.0% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 1.2× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 1 China 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bangladesh 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Brazil 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Armenia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Germany 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Hungary 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Israel 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Italy 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Jordan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 South Korea 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Latvia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Lithuania 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Romania 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Spain 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Taiwan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uzbekistan?
- Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Uzbekistan was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Uzbekistan ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.