Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in China
China: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in China, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
China recorded 3 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
China ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in China, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 1.2× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- China's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near China
- 1 Bangladesh 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Brazil 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Armenia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Germany 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Hungary 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Israel 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Italy 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Jordan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 South Korea 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Latvia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Lithuania 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Romania 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Spain 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Taiwan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 165.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 206.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 102.37 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in China?
- Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in China was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does China rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- China ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.