Italy vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Italy
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Italy currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Italy or Uzbekistan?
- Italy, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Italy and Uzbekistan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Uzbekistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Italy and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Italy ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.