Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Turkey
Turkey: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data was 0.104 in 2023. ▼ Falling
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Turkey, 2015–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Turkey recorded 0.104 for dimension 4.3: geospatial data in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of down 64.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Turkey peaked at 0.29 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.104, in 2022.
That places Turkey 158th out of 180 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Turkey, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.29 | — |
| 2016 | 0.217 | -25.2% |
| 2017 | 0.125 | -42.4% |
| 2018 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.127 | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 0.127 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.104 | -18.1% |
| 2023 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
Turkey compared with similar countries
- Turkey's 0.104 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.2785, 37% of the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Turkey's 0.104 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.298, 35% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1764 | 0.125 | 0.29 | 5 |
| 2020s | 0.1155 | 0.104 | 0.127 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Turkey
- 158 United Kingdom 0.104 compare
- 160 Guinea-Bissau 0.084 compare
- 160 Latvia 0.084 compare
- 160 Tajikistan 0.084 compare
More reference data data for Turkey
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.815 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 22.31 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.31 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 53.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 103 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.35 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Turkey?
- Dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Turkey was 0.104 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Turkey?
- The highest recorded value was 0.29 in 2015.
- What is the lowest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Turkey?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.104 in 2022.
- How does Turkey rank for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Turkey ranks 158th out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 4.3: geospatial data rising or falling in Turkey?
- Over the last ten years it is down 64.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Turkey data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.