Latvia vs Turkey: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Latvia
0.084
in 2023
Turkey
0.104
in 2023
Latvia rank
157th
Turkey rank
155th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Latvia
  • Turkey
00.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 0.104 against 0.084 in Latvia, a difference of 0.02.

That makes Turkey's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 157th and Turkey ranks 155th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Turkey Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1552 0.148 0.0073 Latvia
2020s 0.0945 0.1155 0.021 Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Latvia or Turkey?
Turkey, at 0.104 against 0.084 in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Latvia and Turkey?
0.02, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Turkey?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Turkey rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Latvia ranks 157th and Turkey ranks 155th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.