Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Oman

Oman: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.7 in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.7
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
134th
of 214 countries
All-time high
0.7
in 2016
All-time low
0.2
in 2004
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Oman, 2004–2023

0.20.30.40.50.60.72004201320232004: 0.22005: 0.22006: 0.22007: 0.22008: 0.22009: 0.22010: 0.32011: 0.32012: 0.32013: 0.32014: 0.32015: 0.52016: 0.72017: 0.72018: 0.72019: 0.72020: 0.72021: 0.72022: 0.72023: 0.7

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

Oman recorded 0.7 for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in 2023. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.

The figure is up 133.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Oman peaked at 0.7 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.2, in 2004.

That places Oman 134th out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2 0.2 0.2 6
2010s 0.48 0.3 0.7 10
2020s 0.7 0.7 0.7 4

Countries ranked near Oman

  1. 133 China 0.734 compare
  2. 134 Belize 0.7 compare
  3. 134 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.7 compare
  4. 134 Burundi 0.7 compare
  5. 134 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.7 compare
  6. 134 Grenada 0.7 compare
  7. 134 Maldives 0.7 compare
  8. 134 Mozambique 0.7 compare
  9. 134 San Marino 0.7 compare
  10. 134 Saudi Arabia 0.7 compare
  11. 134 Saint Lucia 0.7 compare

See the full ranking of 217 places →

More reference data data for Oman

All data for Oman →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Oman?
Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Oman was 0.7 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Oman?
The highest recorded value was 0.7 in 2016.
What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Oman?
The lowest recorded value was 0.2 in 2004.
How does Oman rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
Oman ranks 134th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Oman?
Over the last ten years it is up 133.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Oman data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further