Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.7 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at 0.7.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 40.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 0.734 in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.2, in 2004.
That places Democratic Republic of Congo 134th out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.5368 | 0.2 | 0.734 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
- 133 China 0.734 compare
- 134 Belize 0.7 compare
- 134 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.7 compare
- 134 Burundi 0.7 compare
- 134 Grenada 0.7 compare
- 134 Maldives 0.7 compare
- 134 Mozambique 0.7 compare
- 134 Oman 0.7 compare
- 134 San Marino 0.7 compare
- 134 Saudi Arabia 0.7 compare
- 134 Saint Lucia 0.7 compare
More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 293.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 220.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 3,924 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 3,062 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 235.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 313.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.2179 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 313.43 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Democratic Republic of Congo was 0.7 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0.734 in 2017.
- What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2 in 2004.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 134th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further