Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in China
China: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.734 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in China, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
China recorded 0.734 for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in 2023.
That represents a change of up 46.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in China peaked at 0.834 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.4, in 2004.
China ranks 133rd of 214 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.6536 | 0.5 | 0.834 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.784 | 0.734 | 0.834 | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 134 Belize 0.7 compare
- 134 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.7 compare
- 134 Burundi 0.7 compare
- 134 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.7 compare
- 134 Grenada 0.7 compare
- 134 Maldives 0.7 compare
- 134 Mozambique 0.7 compare
- 134 Oman 0.7 compare
- 134 San Marino 0.7 compare
- 134 Saudi Arabia 0.7 compare
- 134 Saint Lucia 0.7 compare
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 966.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 27,128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 275.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 5,377 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 966.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 336,373 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 116.22 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in China?
- Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in China was 0.734 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.834 in 2016.
- What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4 in 2004.
- How does China rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
- China ranks 133rd out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 46.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further