Control of Corruption in Eswatini
Eswatini: Control of Corruption was 0.2056 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Eswatini, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption in Eswatini is 0.2056 standard error, measured in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.8% on the previous year and down 36.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Eswatini peaked at 0.5569 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.2056 standard error, in 2011.
Eswatini ranks 8th of 53 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.5569 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.3449 standard error | -38.1% |
| 2000 | 0.3251 standard error | -5.7% |
| 2002 | 0.3414 standard error | +5.0% |
| 2003 | 0.2973 standard error | -12.9% |
| 2004 | 0.2617 standard error | -12.0% |
| 2005 | 0.2572 standard error | -1.7% |
| 2006 | 0.2251 standard error | -12.5% |
| 2007 | 0.225 standard error | -0.1% |
| 2008 | 0.2251 standard error | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.2295 standard error | +2.0% |
| 2010 | 0.2072 standard error | -9.7% |
| 2011 | 0.2056 standard error | -0.8% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 0.2056 standard error is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1659 standard error, 1.2× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 0.2056 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1749 standard error, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4509 standard error | 0.3449 standard error | 0.5569 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2653 standard error | 0.225 standard error | 0.3414 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.2064 standard error | 0.2056 standard error | 0.2072 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More reference data data for Eswatini
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0048 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.026 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Eswatini?
- Control of corruption in Eswatini was 0.2056 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5569 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2056 standard error in 2011.
- How does Eswatini rank for control of corruption?
- Eswatini ranks 8th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is down 36.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.