Djibouti vs Eswatini: Control of Corruption

Djibouti
0.2275 standard error
in 2011
Eswatini
0.2056 standard error
in 2011
Djibouti rank
6th
Eswatini rank
8th

Control of Corruption over time

  • Djibouti
  • Eswatini
00.20.40.6199620032011

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 0.2275 standard error against 0.2056 standard error in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0219 standard error.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Djibouti ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 8th of 53 regions.

Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4509 standard error 0.4509 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.2774 standard error 0.2653 standard error 0.0121 standard error Djibouti
2010s 0.2278 standard error 0.2064 standard error 0.0213 standard error Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption, Djibouti or Eswatini?
Djibouti, at 0.2275 standard error against 0.2056 standard error in Eswatini as of 2011.
What is the difference in control of corruption between Djibouti and Eswatini?
0.0219 standard error, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Eswatini?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Djibouti and Eswatini rank globally for control of corruption?
Djibouti ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 8th of 53 regions.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 688 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.