Control of Corruption in Somalia
Somalia: Control of Corruption was 0.206 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Somalia, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption in Somalia is 0.206 standard error, measured in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.8% on the previous year and down 39.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Somalia peaked at 0.4739 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.206 standard error, in 2011.
That places Somalia 7th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Somalia, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.4739 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.3642 standard error | -23.1% |
| 2000 | 0.339 standard error | -6.9% |
| 2002 | 0.3929 standard error | +15.9% |
| 2003 | 0.2829 standard error | -28.0% |
| 2004 | 0.2497 standard error | -11.7% |
| 2005 | 0.2389 standard error | -4.3% |
| 2006 | 0.2462 standard error | +3.0% |
| 2007 | 0.2563 standard error | +4.1% |
| 2008 | 0.2612 standard error | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 0.2247 standard error | -13.9% |
| 2010 | 0.2164 standard error | -3.7% |
| 2011 | 0.206 standard error | -4.8% |
Somalia compared with similar countries
- Somalia's 0.206 standard error is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.1776 standard error, 1.2× the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Somalia's 0.206 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1749 standard error, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.419 standard error | 0.3642 standard error | 0.4739 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2769 standard error | 0.2247 standard error | 0.3929 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.2112 standard error | 0.206 standard error | 0.2164 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Somalia
More reference data data for Somalia
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 1,290 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8842 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.4444 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0115 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 11,378 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 41.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 3.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 40,976 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 42.94 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Somalia?
- Control of corruption in Somalia was 0.206 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Somalia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4739 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Somalia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.206 standard error in 2011.
- How does Somalia rank for control of corruption?
- Somalia ranks 7th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Somalia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 39.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Somalia data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.