Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia
Czechia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.7817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Czechia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, control of corruption - governance estimate in Czechia stood at 0.7817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of down 14.2% on the previous year and up 32.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Czechia peaked at 0.9108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0.2622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Czechia ranks 47th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.8084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.7813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.4% |
| 2000 | 0.2622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -66.4% |
| 2002 | 0.4167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +58.9% |
| 2003 | 0.5199 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.8% |
| 2004 | 0.4588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.8% |
| 2005 | 0.5714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.6% |
| 2006 | 0.5439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.8% |
| 2007 | 0.4341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.2% |
| 2008 | 0.4201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.2% |
| 2009 | 0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.3% |
| 2010 | 0.4124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2011 | 0.4903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.9% |
| 2012 | 0.4262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.1% |
| 2013 | 0.4009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.9% |
| 2014 | 0.5072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +26.5% |
| 2015 | 0.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.3% |
| 2016 | 0.6216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.4% |
| 2017 | 0.7464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.1% |
| 2018 | 0.6244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.3% |
| 2019 | 0.615 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.5861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2021 | 0.7456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.2% |
| 2022 | 0.8159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.4% |
| 2023 | 0.8745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.2% |
| 2024 | 0.9108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.1% |
| 2025 | 0.7817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.2% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 0.7817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 83% of the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 0.7817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.4477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.5434 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
- 44 United States 0.8652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 45 Poland 0.8484 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 46 Saudi Arabia 0.8056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 48 Portugal 0.7725 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 49 Latvia 0.7699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 50 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.7227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Czechia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1071 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5681 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Czechia?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Czechia was 0.7817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.9108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Czechia rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Czechia ranks 47th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.