Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Latvia
Latvia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was 0.8251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Latvia, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0.8251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for control of corruption - governance estimate in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.3% on the previous year and up 62.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Latvia peaked at 0.8424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2021 and was at its lowest, -0.2948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
Latvia ranks 44th of 205 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Latvia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.2948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -96.3% |
| 2000 | -0.2494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2198.9% |
| 2002 | 0.1101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -144.1% |
| 2003 | 0.274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +149.0% |
| 2004 | 0.1727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -37.0% |
| 2005 | 0.3168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +83.4% |
| 2006 | 0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.9% |
| 2007 | 0.3061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.2% |
| 2008 | 0.2777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.3% |
| 2009 | 0.259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.7% |
| 2010 | 0.3437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.7% |
| 2011 | 0.3904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.6% |
| 2012 | 0.3863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.4289 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.0% |
| 2014 | 0.5066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.1% |
| 2015 | 0.6009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.6% |
| 2016 | 0.5908 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2017 | 0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.6% |
| 2019 | 0.6991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.4% |
| 2020 | 0.7605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.8% |
| 2021 | 0.8424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.8% |
| 2022 | 0.8239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2023 | 0.7759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.8% |
| 2024 | 0.8251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.3% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.8251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 83% of the median. (73 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.8251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.5532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.5× the median. (53 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | -2198.9% | -0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2003 | +149.0% | 0.1101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Latvia?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Latvia was 0.8251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2021.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Latvia rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Latvia ranks 44th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 62.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.