Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Poland
Poland: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Poland, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for control of corruption - governance estimate in 2024.
The figure is up 5.4% on the previous year and up 2.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Poland peaked at 0.8707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.1126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Poland ranks 46th of 205 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Poland, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.8425 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.7502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2000 | 0.4963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -33.8% |
| 2002 | 0.3442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -30.6% |
| 2003 | 0.3612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2004 | 0.1126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -68.8% |
| 2005 | 0.2505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +122.4% |
| 2006 | 0.325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.7% |
| 2007 | 0.3179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2008 | 0.4273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +34.4% |
| 2009 | 0.5739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +34.3% |
| 2010 | 0.6391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.4% |
| 2011 | 0.7619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.2% |
| 2012 | 0.8135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.8% |
| 2013 | 0.8071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 0.7738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.1% |
| 2015 | 0.8357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.8707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.2% |
| 2017 | 0.8294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2018 | 0.7768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2019 | 0.7163 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.8% |
| 2020 | 0.7442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.7% |
| 2022 | 0.6674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.7535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.9% |
| 2024 | 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.4% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 80% of the median. (73 countries reporting)
- Poland's 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.5532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.4× the median. (53 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | +122.4% | 0.1126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8425 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.3565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.7824 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More reference data data for Poland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.499 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8896 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.84 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Poland?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Poland was 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2016.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Poland rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Poland ranks 46th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.