Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Colombia
Colombia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Colombia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance estimate in Colombia is -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 9.3% on the previous year and up 2.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Colombia peaked at -0.0732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004 and was at its lowest, -0.6253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Colombia 118th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Colombia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.5189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.5946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.6% |
| 2000 | -0.6253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.2% |
| 2002 | -0.2352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -62.4% |
| 2003 | -0.181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.0% |
| 2004 | -0.0732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -59.6% |
| 2005 | -0.0996 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +36.1% |
| 2006 | -0.2039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +104.6% |
| 2007 | -0.2645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.7% |
| 2008 | -0.2289 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.5% |
| 2009 | -0.288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.8% |
| 2010 | -0.3741 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.9% |
| 2011 | -0.2029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -45.8% |
| 2012 | -0.408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +101.0% |
| 2013 | -0.4407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
| 2014 | -0.3709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.8% |
| 2015 | -0.3168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.6% |
| 2016 | -0.3686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.3% |
| 2017 | -0.4096 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.1% |
| 2018 | -0.3177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.4% |
| 2019 | -0.2722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.3% |
| 2020 | -0.2565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.8% |
| 2021 | -0.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.2% |
| 2022 | -0.2582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.4% |
| 2023 | -0.2953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.4% |
| 2024 | -0.2822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2025 | -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.3% |
Colombia compared with similar countries
- Colombia's -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Colombia's -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.2444 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.3482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2785 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
- 115 Bulgaria -0.2886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 116 North Macedonia -0.2978 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 117 Albania -0.3011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 119 Maldives -0.3339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 120 Tanzania -0.3339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 121 Trinidad and Tobago -0.3386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Colombia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4113 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 61.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 94.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Colombia?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Colombia was -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Colombia rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Colombia ranks 118th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.