Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Colombia
-0.2937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
-0.2941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Colombia rank
110th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
111th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Colombia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102024

How they compare

Colombia currently reports -0.2937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 110th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 111th of 204 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0883 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Colombia
2000s -0.2437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5252 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Colombia
2010s -0.3494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4914 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.142 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Colombia
2020s -0.2771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Colombia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Colombia, at -0.2937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Colombia ranks 110th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 111th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/colombia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/colombia/tanzania/">Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.