Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in North Macedonia

North Macedonia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. β—† Volatile

Latest (2024)
-0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
up 7.0%
World rank
115th
of 204 countries
All-time high
-0.0924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2013
All-time low
-0.9285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2000
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in North Macedonia, 1996–2024

-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-01996201020241996: -0.597 approx. -2.5 to +2.51998: -0.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52000: -0.928 approx. -2.5 to +2.52002: -0.883 approx. -2.5 to +2.52003: -0.907 approx. -2.5 to +2.52004: -0.492 approx. -2.5 to +2.52005: -0.516 approx. -2.5 to +2.52006: -0.294 approx. -2.5 to +2.52007: -0.276 approx. -2.5 to +2.52008: -0.265 approx. -2.5 to +2.52009: -0.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.52010: -0.313 approx. -2.5 to +2.52011: -0.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.52012: -0.128 approx. -2.5 to +2.52013: -0.092 approx. -2.5 to +2.52014: -0.145 approx. -2.5 to +2.52015: -0.306 approx. -2.5 to +2.52016: -0.296 approx. -2.5 to +2.52017: -0.262 approx. -2.5 to +2.52018: -0.341 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: -0.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: -0.457 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: -0.386 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: -0.333 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: -0.354 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: -0.329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

In 2024, control of corruption - governance estimate in North Macedonia stood at -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That represents a change of up 7.0% on the previous year and down 126.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in North Macedonia peaked at -0.0924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013 and was at its lowest, -0.9285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.

North Macedonia ranks 115th of 204 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s -0.5986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.597 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2000s -0.5345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 9
2010s -0.2684 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 10
2020s -0.3717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 5

Countries ranked near North Macedonia

  1. 112 India -0.2953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 113 Lesotho -0.3024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 114 Argentina -0.3257 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 116 Gambia -0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 117 Maldives -0.336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 118 Trinidad and Tobago -0.3398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 204 places β†’

More reference data data for North Macedonia

All data for North Macedonia β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is control of corruption - governance estimate in North Macedonia?
Control of corruption - governance estimate in North Macedonia was -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in North Macedonia?
The highest recorded value was -0.0924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in North Macedonia?
The lowest recorded value was -0.9285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
How does North Macedonia rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
North Macedonia ranks 115th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in North Macedonia?
Over the last ten years it is down 126.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this North Macedonia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in North Macedonia. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/north-macedonia/">Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in North Macedonia</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.