Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland

Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural was 11.9% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
11.9%
Change on year
down 12.4%
World rank
21st
of 35 countries
All-time high
13.6%
in 2009
All-time low
11.1%
in 2010
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland, 2005–2019

0510152005201220192005: 11.92006: 13.42007: 13.12008: 11.52009: 13.62010: 11.12011: 12.22012: 13.52015: 13.12016: 13.52017: 13.52019: 11.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Poland stood at 11.9%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 12.4% on the previous year and down 12.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Poland peaked at 13.6% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 11.1%, in 2010.

Poland ranks 21st of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 11.9%
2006 13.4% +12.8%
2007 13.1% -2.7%
2008 11.5% -12.4%
2009 13.6% +18.7%
2010 11.1% -18.2%
2011 12.2% +9.7%
2012 13.5% +10.5%
2015 13.1% -3.1%
2016 13.5% +3.3%
2017 13.5% +0.1%
2019 11.9% -12.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 12.7% 11.5% 13.6% 5
2010s 12.7% 11.1% 13.5% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 18 South Africa 13.6% compare
  2. 19 Ecuador 13.6% compare
  3. 20 Côte d'Ivoire 13.4% compare
  4. 22 Burkina Faso 11.8% compare
  5. 23 Uruguay 11.8% compare
  6. 24 Mongolia 11.7% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Poland?
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Poland was 11.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 13.6% in 2009.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 11.1% in 2010.
How does Poland rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
Poland ranks 21st out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/poland/">Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population