Ecuador vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Ecuador
13.6%
in 2022
Poland
11.9%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
19th
Poland rank
21st
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 13.6% against 11.9% in Poland, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Poland ranks 21st of 35 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.1% | 11.5% | 2.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 12.5% | 12.7% | 0.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Ecuador or Poland?
- Ecuador, at 13.6% against 11.9% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Ecuador and Poland?
- 1.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Poland ranks 21st of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population