Mongolia vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Mongolia
11.7%
in 2020
Poland
11.9%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
24th
Poland rank
21st
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 11.9% against 11.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Mongolia ranks 24th and Poland ranks 21st of 35 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.2% | 13.3% | 4.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 11.4% | 12.6% | 1.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 11.9% against 11.7% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.2%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 24th and Poland ranks 21st of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population