Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus
Belarus: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural was 14.5% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus stood at 14.5%.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and down 0.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus peaked at 18.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 11.5%, in 2015.
That places Belarus 14th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 16.2% | — |
| 2009 | 14.5% | -10.7% |
| 2010 | 14.6% | +0.8% |
| 2012 | 18.0% | +22.8% |
| 2013 | 13.5% | -24.8% |
| 2014 | 13.0% | -3.4% |
| 2015 | 11.5% | -11.4% |
| 2016 | 15.3% | +33.0% |
| 2017 | 12.2% | -20.5% |
| 2018 | 14.5% | +18.5% |
| 2019 | 14.5% | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.4% | 14.5% | 16.2% | 2 |
| 2010s | 14.1% | 11.5% | 18.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus?
- Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus was 14.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 18.0% in 2012.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.5% in 2015.
- How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 14th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population