Belarus vs El Salvador: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Belarus
14.5%
in 2019
El Salvador
13.7%
in 2022
Belarus rank
14th
El Salvador rank
16th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 14.5% against 13.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 14th and El Salvador ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.4% | 10.2% | 5.1% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 14.2% | 10.7% | 3.5% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Belarus or El Salvador?
- Belarus, at 14.5% against 13.7% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 0.8%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 14th and El Salvador ranks 16th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population