Belarus vs Bolivia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Belarus
14.5%
in 2019
Bolivia
13.7%
in 2021
Belarus rank
14th
Bolivia rank
17th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Belarus
- Bolivia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 14.5% against 13.7% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 14th and Bolivia ranks 17th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Bolivia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.4% | 6.7% | 8.7% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 14.1% | 11.8% | 2.4% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Belarus or Bolivia?
- Belarus, at 14.5% against 13.7% in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Belarus and Bolivia?
- 0.8%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bolivia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Bolivia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 14th and Bolivia ranks 17th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population