Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland

Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 9.0% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
9.0%
Change on year
down 21.8%
World rank
26th
of 36 countries
All-time high
11.5%
in 2017
All-time low
8.2%
in 2007
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland, 2005–2019

02.557.51012.52005201220192005: 9.82006: 92007: 8.22008: 8.62009: 9.52010: 8.62011: 9.92012: 10.22015: 8.82016: 112017: 11.52019: 9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Poland recorded 9.0% for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 21.8% on the previous year and down 5.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Poland peaked at 11.5% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 8.2%, in 2007.

Poland ranks 26th of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 9.8%
2006 9.0% -8.1%
2007 8.2% -9.0%
2008 8.6% +5.3%
2009 9.5% +10.0%
2010 8.6% -9.9%
2011 9.9% +15.7%
2012 10.2% +3.4%
2015 8.8% -14.3%
2016 11.0% +25.4%
2017 11.5% +4.7%
2019 9.0% -21.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 9.0% 8.2% 9.8% 5
2010s 9.9% 8.6% 11.5% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 23 Brazil 10.1% compare
  2. 24 Honduras 9.6% compare
  3. 25 Mongolia 9.6% compare
  4. 27 Burkina Faso 7.5% compare
  5. 28 Côte d'Ivoire 7.1% compare
  6. 29 Kazakhstan 7.0% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Poland?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Poland was 9.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 11.5% in 2017.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 8.2% in 2007.
How does Poland rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Poland ranks 26th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/poland/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population