Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire

Côte d'Ivoire: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 7.1% in 2021. ▲ Rising

Latest (2021)
7.1%
Change on year
down 54.5%
World rank
28th
of 36 countries
All-time high
15.7%
in 2018
All-time low
7.1%
in 2021
Years of data
5
2002–2021

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire, 2002–2021

0510152002201120212002: 7.92008: 8.42015: 7.42018: 15.72021: 7.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2021, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire stood at 7.1%. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 54.5% on the previous year and down 15.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire peaked at 15.7% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 7.1%, in 2021.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 36 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Côte d'Ivoire, 2002 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2002 7.9%
2008 8.4% +6.2%
2015 7.4% -12.3%
2018 15.7% +112.1%
2021 7.1% -54.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.2% 7.9% 8.4% 2
2010s 11.5% 7.4% 15.7% 2
2020s 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 1

Countries ranked near Côte d'Ivoire

  1. 25 Mongolia 9.6% compare
  2. 26 Poland 9.0% compare
  3. 27 Burkina Faso 7.5% compare
  4. 29 Kazakhstan 7.0% compare
  5. 30 Kosovo 7.0% compare
  6. 30 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 7.0% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Côte d'Ivoire

All data for Côte d'Ivoire →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire was 7.1% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
The highest recorded value was 15.7% in 2018.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
The lowest recorded value was 7.1% in 2021.
How does Côte d'Ivoire rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th out of 36 countries with data for 2021.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Côte d'Ivoire?
Over the last ten years it is down 15.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Côte d'Ivoire data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/cote-d-ivoire/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population