Honduras vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Honduras
9.6%
in 2019
Poland
9.0%
in 2019
Honduras rank
24th
Poland rank
26th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Honduras
- Poland
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 9.6% against 9.0% in Poland, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Honduras ranks 24th and Poland ranks 26th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.6% | 9.1% | 0.6% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 8.7% | 9.8% | 1.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Honduras or Poland?
- Honduras, at 9.6% against 9.0% in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Honduras and Poland?
- 0.6%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Honduras ranks 24th and Poland ranks 26th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population