Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines was 292.74 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Uzbekistan, 1992–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
In 2023, average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Uzbekistan stood at 292.74 kilograms per year per capita.
The figure is down 2.4% on the previous year and up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Uzbekistan peaked at 300 kilograms per year per capita in 2022 and was at its lowest, 70.78 kilograms per year per capita, in 1993.
Uzbekistan ranks 56th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 81.01 kilograms per year per capita | 70.78 kilograms per year per capita | 94.45 kilograms per year per capita | 8 |
| 2000s | 128.52 kilograms per year per capita | 88.64 kilograms per year per capita | 183.91 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2010s | 254.47 kilograms per year per capita | 197.58 kilograms per year per capita | 298.82 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 295.31 kilograms per year per capita | 292.74 kilograms per year per capita | 300 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 53 New Zealand 295.76 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 54 Algeria 293.56 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 57 Brazil 292.55 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 58 Denmark 291.95 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 59 Saudi Arabia 288.58 kilograms per year per capita compare
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Spring temperature anomalies 2.5 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.6564 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month 1.29 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 0.9551 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 2.26 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 518.89 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 0 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Uzbekistan?
- Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Uzbekistan was 292.74 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 300 kilograms per year per capita in 2022.
- What is the lowest average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 70.78 kilograms per year per capita in 1993.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
- Uzbekistan ranks 56th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.