New Zealand vs Uzbekistan: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
New Zealand
295.76
in 2023
Uzbekistan
292.74
in 2023
New Zealand rank
53rd
Uzbekistan rank
56th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- New Zealand
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 295.76 against 292.74 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 3.02.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 56th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 307.44 | 81.01 | 226.43 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 315.54 | 128.52 | 187.02 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 217.2 | 254.47 | 37.26 | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 223.19 | 295.31 | 72.12 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, New Zealand or Uzbekistan?
- New Zealand, at 295.76 against 292.74 in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
- 3.02, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Uzbekistan rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- New Zealand ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 56th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.