Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Serbia
Serbia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines was 404.45 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
404.45 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
down 13.9%
World rank
23rd
of 192 countries
All-time high
469.99 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
All-time low
284.8 kilograms per year per capita
in 2014
Years of data
18
2006–2023
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Serbia, 2006–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 404.45 kilograms per year per capita for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in 2023.
The figure is down 13.9% on the previous year and down 5.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Serbia peaked at 469.99 kilograms per year per capita in 2022 and was at its lowest, 284.8 kilograms per year per capita, in 2014.
Serbia ranks 23rd of 192 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 18 years of available data.
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Serbia, year by year
| Year | kilograms per year per capita | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 360.59 kilograms per year per capita | — |
| 2007 | 390.04 kilograms per year per capita | +8.2% |
| 2008 | 417.7 kilograms per year per capita | +7.1% |
| 2009 | 441.68 kilograms per year per capita | +5.7% |
| 2010 | 354.34 kilograms per year per capita | -19.8% |
| 2011 | 432.29 kilograms per year per capita | +22.0% |
| 2012 | 323.1 kilograms per year per capita | -25.3% |
| 2013 | 427.17 kilograms per year per capita | +32.2% |
| 2014 | 284.8 kilograms per year per capita | -33.3% |
| 2015 | 314.91 kilograms per year per capita | +10.6% |
| 2016 | 345.95 kilograms per year per capita | +9.9% |
| 2017 | 297.81 kilograms per year per capita | -13.9% |
| 2018 | 347.71 kilograms per year per capita | +16.8% |
| 2019 | 372.8 kilograms per year per capita | +7.2% |
| 2020 | 442.62 kilograms per year per capita | +18.7% |
| 2021 | 421.6 kilograms per year per capita | -4.7% |
| 2022 | 469.99 kilograms per year per capita | +11.5% |
| 2023 | 404.45 kilograms per year per capita | -13.9% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 404.45 kilograms per year per capita is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 266.1 kilograms per year per capita, 1.5× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 404.45 kilograms per year per capita is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 265.64 kilograms per year per capita, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 402.5 kilograms per year per capita | 360.59 kilograms per year per capita | 441.68 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
| 2010s | 350.09 kilograms per year per capita | 284.8 kilograms per year per capita | 432.29 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 434.67 kilograms per year per capita | 404.45 kilograms per year per capita | 469.99 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 20 Netherlands 432.65 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 21 Panama 422.73 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 22 Colombia 421.14 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 24 Jamaica 394.75 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 25 Oman 386.83 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 26 Vanuatu 379.48 kilograms per year per capita compare
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Serbia?
- Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Serbia was 404.45 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 469.99 kilograms per year per capita in 2022.
- What is the lowest average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 284.8 kilograms per year per capita in 2014.
- How does Serbia rank for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
- Serbia ranks 23rd out of 192 countries with data for 2023.
- Is average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.