Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory was 61.2% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
61.2%
Change on year
up 46.5%
World rank
3rd
of 31 countries
All-time high
61.2%
in 2019
All-time low
41.8%
in 2017
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Poland, 2005–2019

02040602005201220192005: 56.22006: 532007: 50.62008: 482009: 49.92010: 51.22011: 53.22012: 54.22015: 56.12016: 55.62017: 41.82019: 61.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Poland is 61.2%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 46.5% on the previous year and up 22.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Poland peaked at 61.2% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 41.8%, in 2017.

Poland ranks 3rd of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 56.2%
2006 53.0% -5.6%
2007 50.6% -4.6%
2008 48.0% -5.1%
2009 49.9% +4.0%
2010 51.2% +2.6%
2011 53.2% +3.9%
2012 54.2% +2.0%
2015 56.1% +3.3%
2016 55.6% -0.8%
2017 41.8% -24.9%
2019 61.2% +46.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 51.5% 48.0% 56.2% 5
2010s 53.3% 41.8% 61.2% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 1 Thailand 108.1% compare
  2. 2 Romania 70.0% compare
  3. 4 Belarus 58.7% compare
  4. 5 Kazakhstan 52.1% compare
  5. 6 South Africa 51.0% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Poland was 61.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 61.2% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 41.8% in 2017.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
Poland ranks 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 22.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group