Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory was 58.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
58.7%
Change on year
up 3.2%
World rank
4th
of 31 countries
All-time high
63.3%
in 2016
All-time low
47.3%
in 2009
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, 2008–2019

02040602008201320192008: 48.42009: 47.32010: 47.92012: 47.42013: 50.72014: 49.82015: 57.72016: 63.32017: 61.62018: 56.82019: 58.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus stood at 58.7%.

That represents a change of up 3.2% on the previous year and up 24.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus peaked at 63.3% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 47.3%, in 2009.

Belarus ranks 4th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 48.4%
2009 47.3% -2.3%
2010 47.9% +1.3%
2012 47.4% -1.1%
2013 50.7% +6.9%
2014 49.8% -1.7%
2015 57.7% +15.9%
2016 63.3% +9.6%
2017 61.6% -2.7%
2018 56.8% -7.7%
2019 58.7% +3.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 47.8% 47.3% 48.4% 2
2010s 54.9% 47.4% 63.3% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Thailand 108.1% compare
  2. 2 Romania 70.0% compare
  3. 3 Poland 61.2% compare
  4. 5 Kazakhstan 52.1% compare
  5. 6 South Africa 51.0% compare
  6. 7 Colombia 48.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus was 58.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 63.3% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 47.3% in 2009.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 24.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group