Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Belarus
58.7%
in 2019
Poland
61.2%
in 2019
Belarus rank
4th
Poland rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 61.2% against 58.7% in Belarus, a difference of 2.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.8% | 48.9% | 1.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 56.1% | 53.3% | 2.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 61.2% against 58.7% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Belarus and Poland?
- 2.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group