Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private was 55.1% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
55.1%
Change on year
down 16.5%
World rank
2nd
of 36 countries
All-time high
73.5%
in 2016
All-time low
28.3%
in 2006
Years of data
11
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020

0204060802006201320202006: 28.32011: 32.72012: 31.72013: 38.42014: 71.62015: 61.72016: 73.52017: 67.12018: 65.42019: 662020: 55.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan stood at 55.1%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.5% on the previous year and up 68.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 73.5% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 28.3%, in 2006.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers in Kyrgyzstan, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 28.3%
2011 32.7% +15.4%
2012 31.7% -3.1%
2013 38.4% +21.1%
2014 71.6% +86.5%
2015 61.7% -13.8%
2016 73.5% +19.0%
2017 67.1% -8.7%
2018 65.4% -2.4%
2019 66.0% +0.9%
2020 55.1% -16.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.3% 28.3% 28.3% 1
2010s 56.5% 31.7% 73.5% 9
2020s 55.1% 55.1% 55.1% 1

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 1 Poland 8,490.6% compare
  2. 3 Kosovo 49.3% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 49.3% compare
  4. 5 Romania 48.7% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan was 55.1% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 73.5% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 28.3% in 2006.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 68.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers/kyrgyz-republic/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group