Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Kosovo
49.3%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
55.1%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 55.1% against 49.3% in Kosovo, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.8% | 28.3% | 47.4% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 49.3% | 42.5% | 6.8% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 55.1% against 49.3% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group