Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private was 8,490.6% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
8,490.6%
Change on year
up 106,809.0%
World rank
1st
of 36 countries
All-time high
8,490.6%
in 2019
All-time low
7.9%
in 2017
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Poland, 2005–2019

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k2005201220192005: 15.92006: 14.52007: 15.32008: 14.62009: 14.12010: 17.32011: 15.32012: 15.12015: 12.72016: 9.12017: 7.92019: 8.5k

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Poland stood at 8,490.6%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 106,809.0% on the previous year and up 59,929.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Poland peaked at 8,490.6% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 7.9%, in 2017.

Poland ranks 1st of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 15.9%
2006 14.5% -8.8%
2007 15.3% +4.9%
2008 14.6% -4.2%
2009 14.1% -3.2%
2010 17.3% +22.1%
2011 15.3% -11.3%
2012 15.1% -1.2%
2015 12.7% -15.8%
2016 9.1% -29.0%
2017 7.9% -12.3%
2019 8,490.6% +106809.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 14.9% 14.1% 15.9% 5
2010s 1,224.0% 7.9% 8,490.6% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 2 Kyrgyzstan 55.1% compare
  2. 3 Kosovo 49.3% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 49.3% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Poland was 8,490.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 8,490.6% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 7.9% in 2017.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
Poland ranks 1st out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 59,929.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-private-transfers/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group